My smallest will be 30.5mm Patek 96 [nt]

Dec 12, 2017,05:18 AM
 

No message body









  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Big may be beautiful but what’s the smallest watch you have?

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-08:00
For most of the era of the wrist watch, the range of 33-38mm has been the commonly accepted mens’ size, with the odd tool watch being larger, the odd dress watch smaller. Over the last two decades this has gradually but surely changed. Still, a well propo...  

Interesting thematic

 
 By: Alkiro1 : December 8th, 2017-08:11
The smallest watch I own today is my Emil Lange (35.9mm). But I owned a 34mm skeleton Audemars Piguet and a 35mm Corum 20 dollar coin (I have no picture of them unfortunately). Best wishes Alkiro ...  

Thanks for playing, Alkiro!

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-08:15
And a lovely Lange πŸ‘ŒπŸ»

Thanks my friend

 
 By: Alkiro1 : December 8th, 2017-08:19
Best wishes Alkiro

πŸ‘πŸ» [nt]

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-08:22

Absolutely! :)

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-08:35
A +1000 to that!

So stunning πŸ‘ŒπŸ»πŸ˜˜ i just love this dail 😘

 
 By: Watchonthewrists : December 8th, 2017-11:47
Fantastic picture πŸ‘πŸ»

Hehe thanks my friend 😊

 
 By: Alkiro1 : December 8th, 2017-12:29
Best wishes Alkiro

My smallest watch is my Moser .

 
 By: Watchonthewrists : December 8th, 2017-11:54
there are a few great watches out there who are smaller then that one so maybe !! ...  

πŸ˜‚πŸ‘πŸ»

 
 By: Watchonthewrists : December 8th, 2017-13:12
It sure is my friend . Need to give it some wristtime soon πŸ™πŸ»

And few shots of it for us πŸ˜‰

 
 By: Alkiro1 : December 8th, 2017-13:31
Best wishes Alkiro

39 or 40?

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-13:50
Not saying everyone needs to have a smaller sized piece - taste is of course completely personal Lovely Moser, btw.

It’s 38.8mm πŸ˜‰

 
 By: Alkiro1 : December 8th, 2017-14:03
Best wishes Alkiro

Thanks Alkiro! [nt]

 
 By: KMII : December 9th, 2017-00:45

Always my pleasure my friend

 
 By: Alkiro1 : December 9th, 2017-00:46
Hagwe Best wishes Alkiro

JLC Master Ultra Thin, I love it!

 
 By: eklektik : December 8th, 2017-08:18
34mm of thinness and beauty! Best, Γ‰. ...  

Lovely piece, Eklektik!

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-08:22
One I definitely have on my list 34mm for me was also the entry point for me for a while, with the Minerva Pythagore...

Lecoultre Mark 7 Weems

 
 By: amanico : December 8th, 2017-08:28
And its 32 mm case.... ...  

Very cool piece, Nico!

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-08:34
And the smallest one so far, at 32mm

+1! :) [nt]

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-08:50

33.5 mm Tissot

 
 By: COUNT DE MONET : December 8th, 2017-08:45
The clever case and bracelet design makes it look bigger, at least to me it is looking bigger πŸ˜€. I wear it regularly and love it! ...  

It does look larger!

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-08:48
Thanks for adding this! Being quite weak on my Tissot knowledge - vintage or recent? Looking like new at any rate

Produced from 1972 - 1980

 
 By: COUNT DE MONET : December 8th, 2017-09:44
Have to ask a local watch maker about the exact year. Regarding condition: The background of the logo is still black. A provision to remove sections of links, for a watch that might have not cost too much! ...  

Truly impressive!

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-13:57
I have to say the more details you show, the more impressed I am

Smallest I have is at 35mm

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : December 8th, 2017-08:53
Don’t have a photo library on iPhone. 2509. 3541. 3417. Calatrava. Time only can work perfectly with a smaller watch.

Thanks Baron! :)

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-09:23
If you get some pictures when you get access would be much obliged!

found these....

 
 By: Baron - Mr Red : December 9th, 2017-00:55
...  

Truly beautiful!

 
 By: KMII : December 9th, 2017-01:00
Thanks for digging them up

Both of mine are small! :-)

 
 By: sham1 : December 8th, 2017-09:23
The smallest watch I have would be a toss between the 34.6mm Patek 7200R London Edition and the rectangular Patek 1530A vintage. They are currently the only two watches in my embarrassingly small collection! ...  

Two lovely pieces, Sham1! :)

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-09:30
A great pair, that - thanks for adding these!

You are most welcome!

 
 By: sham1 : December 8th, 2017-09:32
They are watches I like to think will always be with me as not only have they become a part of me but they kind of exemplify my personality if that makes any sense. And because they are to me a tough act to follow, it makes any new acquisition an extremel... 

I can understand that :)

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-11:38
But if you will continue carefully vetting your purchases like this you will always have a collection you are fully happy with!

Coincidentally :-)

 
 By: sham1 : December 10th, 2017-02:33
I have just vetted a watch that might blend in with my small size collection Will decide this week if I will leave a deposit for it! It is a watch I have adored for too many years. ...  

Very nice!

 
 By: KMII : December 10th, 2017-03:10
Looking forward to hearing your final decision

Your 1530A is truly superb. I love it 😍

 
 By: Alkiro1 : December 8th, 2017-09:39
Best wishes Alkiro

I was a little nervous

 
 By: sham1 : December 8th, 2017-09:42
buying a watch that is 74 years old Alkiro but it has been keeping superb time! Many including Mr Voutilainen himself have admired the watch when I showed it to him so I shall wear it with me when we hopefully meet at the SIHH!

Thank you so much for saying so Alkiro! :-)

 
 By: sham1 : December 8th, 2017-10:01
Quite rare too apparently

Yes and I have bequethed it to

 
 By: sham1 : December 8th, 2017-10:12
my partner one day as it will suit her perfectly too!

Very true :)

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-13:55
But that happens above 40mm, too

There is no escape,

 
 By: sham1 : December 8th, 2017-14:02
is there?!!

Stay single πŸ˜‚

 
 By: Alkiro1 : December 8th, 2017-14:09
Best wishes Alkiro

Very tempting Alkiro!!

 
 By: sham1 : December 9th, 2017-12:56

Never my friend. Always better on our wrists 😁

 
 By: Alkiro1 : December 9th, 2017-00:47
Best wishes Alkiro

Really true. The danger is everywhere 😱😁

 
 By: Alkiro1 : December 8th, 2017-14:02
Best wishes Alkiro

Fortunately....

 
 By: sham1 : December 8th, 2017-14:01
only she if outlives me

It’s an option 😁

 
 By: Alkiro1 : December 8th, 2017-14:07
Best wishes Alkiro

Absolutely as she is

 
 By: sham1 : December 8th, 2017-14:08
ten years younger than me!

I used to go quite crazy

 
 By: sham1 : December 8th, 2017-09:58
when I saw one of these in the 80s and had always liked the mother of pearl dial.

Very cool piece!

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-11:39
Dropping from 32 to 31mm. Is the dial MoP?

Thanks!

 
 By: KtWP : December 8th, 2017-11:50
Yep the dial is MOP, it might be 32mm I'm actually not entirely sure if its 31mm or between 31-32mm.

Still...

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-13:51
Smaller than a full 32mm

Moi, C'est 36mm pour le poignet 7.25"!

 
 By: Velociphile - No longer in the building : December 8th, 2017-12:16
Nice thread, beautiful piece you have. Funny mix of imperial and metric. lol Yes, I am lucky that I have a 'big' wrist. Personally and frankly I despair of some of the wrist shots I see asking the question, "Is this too big?" answer is usually, "YES IT'S ... 

So, which watch of yours...

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-13:53
Is 36mm? 37-42mm is my normal size range, too - with some exceptions at both ends

Explorer 1 [nt]

 
 By: Velociphile - No longer in the building : December 9th, 2017-00:23

Cool! [nt]

 
 By: KMII : December 9th, 2017-00:46

Wears big though. [nt]

 
 By: Velociphile - No longer in the building : December 9th, 2017-06:08

Lovely piece!

 
 By: KMII : December 8th, 2017-13:54
Time for that wrist shot to get taken

Sublime! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : December 8th, 2017-16:02

Absolutely! [nt]

 
 By: KMII : December 9th, 2017-09:26

Several in my collection ~ 33 mm, K . . .

 
 By: Dr No : December 8th, 2017-15:21
. . . and feel utterly at ease wearing them. Omegas, all. ['40 cal 30] ['44 ref 2242, 18 jewel 30T2SC] [ ca '45 R17.8] There are more, but these three are representative . Art ...  

Beautiful, Art!

 
 By: KMII : December 9th, 2017-00:49
Especially like the square one but all show how there is lots of horological pleasure at under 40mm!

30mm diameter

 
 By: MTF : December 8th, 2017-16:02
This was my father-in-law's watch when he was in the Military Police (RAF) fighting Communism in South-East Asia during the late 1950s. He was / is a big man and built like...er...a military policeman. Then, man-size watches were 30mm diameter (without cr...  

And I guess Welsh military policemen were far from the daintiest :)

 
 By: KMII : December 9th, 2017-00:58
Great story MTF and a cool piece! And only 30mm Definitely priceless!

Some of our most loved watches are of humble origins

 
 By: MTF : December 9th, 2017-08:23
KMII, On paper, this is an almost worthless watch in the market today. Only 30 mm diameter in gold-plated steel case with refurbished dial and non-original crown from a lowly brand. Yet, it's one of a handful of "more" beloved watches because of it's prov... 

As you say...

 
 By: KMII : December 9th, 2017-09:25
It’s the stories behind them and the emotions associated with them that count so much more That’s one of the great aspects of Puristspro...

Interesting....

 
 By: JFT : December 9th, 2017-09:51
Perhaps the smallest one I had (sold it couple months ago, still a bit sad about it) is this one at 33mm... Big surprises most of the times come in a small packages... HAGWE ...  

Very interesting Omega...

 
 By: KMII : December 9th, 2017-10:23
Not sure I have seen it before but looking great

Some of my smaller watches

 
 By: jml_watches : December 9th, 2017-12:56
They all have big characters though! Nomos 35mm wears a whole lot bigger and thin enough too at 6mm. Oris alarm - mid 30s , but very loud Vulcain Cricket - lots of presence & nice n noisey Lots to like with a smaller watch Cheers JML ...  

Thanks for adding yours, JML!

 
 By: KMII : December 9th, 2017-23:17
All three have lots of character indeed

Nice shot of a beaitiful Seiko, my friend!

 
 By: Seeks : December 10th, 2017-05:23
You made very good points. The smallest ones for me are probably the Triple Date Calendar watches from Omega, VC and JLC, measuring 34-35mm... Thanks for bring this topic up! - - Seeks ...  

A great trio there, Seeks :)

 
 By: KMII : December 10th, 2017-08:47
Thanks for your kind words! Just curious if people still feel comfortable with smaller watches and it seems quite some do! Which is nice

These two ..

 
 By: fernando : December 11th, 2017-01:22
have been my smallest at 37mm and still are but they don't seem so small anymore. Cheers Fernando ...  

A lovely pair Fernando!

 
 By: KMII : December 11th, 2017-02:05
And a great shot πŸ‘πŸ» Thanks for joining in!

My small watches...

 
 By: Tim Jackson : December 11th, 2017-14:10
V&C at 35mm VH at 36mm Both wear slightly larger due to the lug configuration, particularly the Classic by Vianney... Love them both, Cheers, Tim ...  

Thanks for adding these two superb pieces, Tom!

 
 By: KMII : December 12th, 2017-13:44
Very cool, both

This Vacheron is so so cool

 
 By: Alkiro1 : December 12th, 2017-16:06
Best wishes Alkiro

+1!

 
 By: KMII : December 13th, 2017-02:47
Although i have to say I have a very soft spot for the Vianney Halter Classic after our visit, too

At least we can say that Tim has a great taste for unusual and gorgeous timepieces and, more specifically, lugs

 
 By: Alkiro1 : December 13th, 2017-02:58
I agree with you about VH. That was a true pleasure to meet him and his creations. Best wishes Alkiro

πŸ˜‰

 
 By: Alkiro1 : December 13th, 2017-07:33
Best wishes Alkiro

Lady v-matic

 
 By: cj.cooper : December 12th, 2017-00:04
A ladies Ventura V-matic... 31.6mm ( and 34.5 across the lugs). It's pretty small for a COSC automatic chronometer In fact it's so small the wife says she can't see the time easily enough (!) so she's ended up with a Ventura Ego 36mm, while my V-matic is ...  

Quite an interesting collection!

 
 By: KMII : December 12th, 2017-13:45
The ochs&junior annual calendar is definitely on my shopping list - the Venturas were new to me. Thanks for adding these!

My smallest will be 30.5mm Patek 96 [nt]

 
 By: Maikeru88 : December 12th, 2017-05:18
No message body ...  

Simply exquisite!

 
 By: KMII : December 12th, 2017-13:46
And another demonstration that small sizes work

A couple of mighty mites

 
 By: Tick Talk : December 12th, 2017-07:26
Men's watches in the 40s-50s, now do double duty between the Mrs and myself. The square watch measures 25mm across, and the rectangular 22mm. Tick Talk 2017 Tick Talk 2017 ...  

Thanks Tick-Talk!

 
 By: KMII : December 12th, 2017-13:47
A very interesting pair

35 mm 1962-ish Connie

 
 By: Arie - Mr Orange : December 13th, 2017-08:07
It can work, but I would never buy it because of the size. Too small. So where do I stand? Good size range for me is 40 - 44 mm. And depending on thickness of the case and size of the lugs 40 - 42 mm is perfect. I cannot see us ever going back to the old ...  

Lovely Connie!

 
 By: KMII : December 13th, 2017-08:45
And a good demonstration that you can pull off a 35mm watch As for whether we're going back, who knows. I guess the watch brands will initiate a move back eventually. Some small steps in this direction have been taken already. And it makes it easier to ju... 

Regular people only buy 1 or maybe 2 watches.

 
 By: Arie - Mr Orange : December 13th, 2017-09:09
The only reason going (partially) smaller again would be to accommodate smaller wrists in Asia better (?). But a broad range in watches would be best! 😊

Which would get them to buy another, right? :)

 
 By: KMII : December 14th, 2017-05:29
33% - 50% increase from the group But fully agree with the broad range approach!

Accutron measures at 32 mm. (nt)

 
 By: Ronald Held : December 14th, 2017-13:44
NT

Got a Spaceview?

 
 By: KMII : December 15th, 2017-10:27
Pictures?

That would be great!

 
 By: KMII : December 15th, 2017-22:13
Thanks in advance

This 22mm UG is by far the smallest I own,

 
 By: rdenney : December 16th, 2017-09:43
but I won't wear it. Part of the problem is blood circulation through my 8-1/4" wrist. But these three, at 34mm, are the smallest I will wear: Late 60's Favre-Leuba (cal 253), ca. 1950 Ebel ref 2120082, and a Bulova Accutron (cal 218). --Rick ...  

22mm is a new record! :)

 
 By: KMII : December 16th, 2017-11:12
Thanks for adding yours - four truly interesting pieces there. Is it just the strap on the UG that’s too short then?

Yes, the strap is too short...

 
 By: rdenney : December 17th, 2017-00:03
But it's the original strap. I bought the watch from a retiring jeweler as new old stock, in the original box, for its original retail price. I could make it fit with a new strap, but I'd rather put a short strap on it and let the Redhead wear it. --Rick ...  

Also a fair arrangement :)

 
 By: KMII : December 17th, 2017-00:33
Great shot with the box!